Turn your case records into an interactive investigation report. Review findings, follow source references and see the questions the evidence leaves open.
Trucking and auto collisions · Premises liability · Medical negligence
Illustrative report using fictional records. This is a format demonstration, not output from a completed investigation.
This example illustrates a supported finding and an unresolved question.
The maintenance entry records a warning for Unit 27. Whether a brake fault contributed to the collision remains unresolved.
Inspect the cited record · Exhibit S-1 →06:40, Unit 27: brake warning reported. Inspection pending.
The entry establishes a recorded warning. It does not, by itself, establish brake failure or causation.
Consensus checks identify disagreements between extractions. Findings are reconciled across the supplied corpus.
A dedicated adversarial review stage tests competing explanations and counterevidence against proposed findings.
Source references connect findings to supporting records. Your team can check the cited passage and the limits of what it establishes.
Start with the demo. If an investigation fits, agree the work before transferring records.
After the demo, we review your investigation goals and available records. We agree scope, a fixed engagement fee and a delivery timeline before work begins.
We agree confidentiality, authorized access and data handling before transfer. Evidence preparation includes transcription, OCR and normalization for the supplied records.
We analyze records in stages, then reconcile findings across the supplied corpus. A dedicated adversarial review stage tests competing explanations and counterevidence. Capacity and scope are agreed for each engagement.
Your legal team receives an interactive findings report and a walkthrough. Use source references, evidence grades and visible gaps to check the findings before relying on them.
We agree confidentiality, authorized access, data handling, and retention before receiving case files. Ask us about processing providers and deletion arrangements during your demo.
We walk through an example investigation report, show how findings connect to evidence, answer your questions and discuss whether Pandexis fits your firm’s needs. No case files are needed.
After the demo, we review your goals and records, then agree the scope and a fixed engagement fee before work begins.
We agree a delivery timeline after reviewing your records and investigation goals.
We agree confidentiality, authorized access, data handling, and retention before receiving case files. Ask us about processing providers and deletion arrangements during your demo.
Check the supporting records, competing explanations and evidence gaps before relying on a finding. Your counsel determines privilege, work-product treatment and any use in proceedings.
Walk through an example with our team and discuss whether Pandexis fits your firm’s needs.
Request a demo